michael kors handbags online uae jobs

Joint compensation for economic losses 20 million yuan and reasonable expenses of 100 million. JDB (China), Guangdong JDB company argued: Guangdong JDB company is not involved in the main ad, not the proper defendant in the case. Ads are not involved in the case to Guangzhou Pharmaceutical Group Wanglaoji large health company caused direct damage, both companies have no right to litigate this case. Involved in creative Statistics quoted the China Industrial Information Center released the objective truth, clear statements, the relevant public will not cause misunderstanding, does not constitute a false propaganda. Court of First Instance, involving advertising language constitutes a false propaganda. A tort is involved JDB (China), Guangdong JDB goodwill during the cooperation due to product and trademark work together to create sales results obtained by their own party interests as one-sided propaganda and disputes arising from its existence Wong Lo Kat trademark use of goodwill subjective intent, but the content is not involved in propaganda and unfounded. Thus, taking into account both the existence of History and disputes, the case to specific violations of the nature, circumstances, subjective fault, impact on Guangzhou Pharmaceutical Group and Wong Lo Kat big health companies may have caused and Guangzhou Pharmaceutical Group and Wong Lo Kat big health companies to stop infringement necessary and reasonable expenses paid by the behavior, the court determined comprehensively JDB (China), Guangdong JDB liability. Accordingly, the Court of First Instance ruling: JDB (China) company to immediately stop using the slogan was involved; JDB (China), Guangdong JDB Guangzhou Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited compensation and Guangzhou Wanglaoji within 10 days after the entry into force of this judgment health industry Co., Ltd. economic losses and reasonable expenses totaling 3 million yuan; dismissed GPHL other claims wanglaoji big health companies. After the verdicts, JDB (China), Guangdong JDB company refused to accept a common appeal to the Beijing High Court, requesting revocation of the original judgment, dismissed all claims commuted GPHL wanglaoji big health companies. This morning, the reporter learned from the High Court, the court of second instance upheld the first instance verdict. Guangdong JDB second instance whether the focus should be jointly and severally liable? JDB (China), Guangdong JDB believes Canton